Insurers are leaving fire- and flood-prone areas in the U.S. Home values could take a hit

Some insurance companies arepulling back coveragefrom fire- and flood-prone areas، leaving homeowners with limited affordable options. This trend may even affect the property value of American homes، experts say.

The nation’s largest homeowner’s insurance company، State Farm،stopped accepting new applicationsfor policies onproperty in Californiain May.Allstateannounced in November that it would “pause new homeowners، condo and commercial insurance policies in California to protect current customers،” theAssociated Press reported in June.

The trend is likely to continue

This trend will likely continue across the insurance industry، said Jeremy Porter، head of climate implications research at First Street Foundation، a nonprofit research organization that compiles comprehensive climate risk data.

“They know the risk is just too high to be actuarially sound for their business،” he said.

In its announcement، State Farm said too many buildings are being destroyed by climate catastrophes، inflation is making it too expensive to rebuild، and it can’t protect its investments any longer.

The problem is not just in California، where wildfires are prevalent. Louisiana and Florida homeowners are also contending witha lack of access to insurance، due to flood risk.

“Losses are increasingly related to climate risk،” said Sean Kevelighan، president and CEO of the Insurance Information Institute، an insurance industry association. “As that risk increases، so does the cost of insuring those assets that people have on hand.”

Even though there wasn’t an increase inmajor disastersin 2023، he said، the industry is still expecting to see $50 billion in losses just because of “severe convective issues” such as flash flooding and the implications of heavier everyday storms.

Without insurance، many homeowners can find themselves in big financial trouble.

Darlene Tucker، 66، and Tom Pinter، 68، are longtime homeowners in Sonora، California. The couple bought their “dream home” 18 years ago and have been enjoying their retirement from their respective jobs in manufacturing.

Tucker also cares for her horses and a rescued 100-pound tortoise on the property، and runs a dog day care center to help make ends meet. She said Pinter also works as a delivery driver to help out.

The couple received a nonrenewal notice from Allstate in November. Tucker told CNBC she has been working with her Allstate agent to find another insurer.

“I had one company step up and said they’d do it for $12،000 a year،” she said — that’s roughly six times her previous annual premium under Allstate of about $2،000.

Losing 12% of property value

She said there was no way thecouplecould afford that new policy، and they would likely have to move.

But Tucker and Pinter may find that selling their home also comes with a steep cost.

Porter said First Street Foundation’s research in California concluded that “the moment that an individual gets a non-renewal letter from the private insurance market، they essentially lose 12% of their property value.”

Insurance costs ‘should be an alarm’ for homebuyers

Experts say the insurance landscape in California is particularly tricky because، in addition to the wildfire risk، thestate has a lawthat adds extra approval measures، including board approval and review by the insurance commissioner، if an insurance company wants to raise the rate of insurance by more than 7%. That’s been in effect since the 1980s.

Kevelighan، of the Insurance Information Institute، said that law، called Proposition 103، creates a regulatory environment in California that restricts the industry from adequately including climate risk in its forecasting and is one of the reasons the industry is being forced to pull back coverage in the state.